Chess.com logo

Chess.com turned a 90-minute task into a CFO-ready analysis — in just a few prompts

30sec
To write a prompt for complex workforce report
90min
Saved for more strategic work

Building a multi-year, multi-dimensional headcount report manually — across country, department, and org level, with both headcount and FTE figures — meant hours of work or pulling someone off higher-priority tasks.

Rippling AI built a complex headcount report in minutes from a short chain of plain-language prompts — delivering saved, reusable reports with full SQL transparency and proactive workforce insights Brendan hadn’t even asked for.

IndustryTechnology
Number of Employees670
HeadquartersUnited States

The Challenge

Brendan Woodroff is the SVP People at Chess.com, the world’s leading chess platform, where roughly 650 people work across a global team. Headcount planning is a regular part of his job — and so is the reporting that supports it.

Chess.com had year-over-year headcount reports already in place. But Brendan wanted to go deeper: a wider time window stretching back several years combined with Q1 2026 year-to-date data; multiple dimensions across country, department, and top-level organization; and both total headcount and full-time equivalent (FTE) figures side by side, with average annual compensation layered in for good measure.

Building that kind of report manually is challenging. Mixing time domains — annual snapshots alongside a partial quarter — means you can’t just run a single automated query. Each slice requires its own configuration. Across three dimensions and two workforce metrics, that’s not one report but many, and stitching them together accurately takes time.

I could spend 30, 60, 90 minutes pulling that together — or ask someone on the team to pull it together. Or I could spend 30 seconds writing a quick prompt and see what I get first.

The Solution

Rippling AI had just launched, and Brendan decided to put it to the test. He started with a focused first prompt: “Create a report showing active headcount by country over time. I want end of year totals for 2023, 2024, 2025, and quarter one of 26.”

The response came back immediately and hit the mark. So he pushed further. He asked for the same data split by department. Then by top-level department. Then he added a new layer: could it pull FTE alongside headcount and calculate average annual compensation relative to FTE, accounting for both salaried and hourly workers? Each time, Rippling AI delivered. The whole chain of prompts — including the thinking between them — took just a few minutes.

I asked for the thing, it brought me the thing. I asked for another thing, it brought me the thing. It was really just quite effective in getting what I wanted.

What set Rippling AI apart from other tools Brendan had used wasn’t just the responsiveness. Most AI tools return a conversational reply — maybe a table in the chat window. Rippling AI did that, and also delivered something more: saved reports for each output, plus the underlying SQL code and data transformations that generated them, attached directly to the response. That meant Brendan could audit exactly how each figure was calculated, and he’d never have to build those reports again — they were saved and ready to reuse.

The Impact

The reports themselves were valuable. But what stayed with Brendan was what came alongside them. Without being asked, Rippling AI analyzed the changes in Chess.com’s workforce over the years and surfaced its own observations: shifts in hiring concentration by country, talent specialization patterns in certain roles, periods of heavy investment into core product teams. Strategic context that Brendan would normally have needed to derive himself — after the data was already in hand.

I wanted to take a look myself and derive some insights, but Rippling AI had already evaluated the changes that occurred over time and called out key observations. I thought those were fascinating insights that saved me a ton of time.

With that analysis ready to go, Brendan was able to walk into a headcount planning meeting with his CFO prepared — data accurate, trends identified, no manual number-crunching required. What might have been a 30 to 90 minute exercise in report-building became a conversation about strategy.