Rippling vs. Central: The 2025 definitive comparison for HR and Payroll
![[Blog - Hero Image] Payroll generic image with coins](http://images.ctfassets.net/k0itp0ir7ty4/5fXF0bdbzJCW2OGLyIgvp1/23dd49a777571f677a738fc8517780ff/Header_Payroll_03_Hero_Image.png)
In this article
Overview: Rippling vs. Central
Selecting an HR and payroll platform shapes how a startup manages compliance, payroll accuracy, benefits administration, onboarding workflows, and the sheer volume of operational tasks founders must navigate as they grow. Two solutions increasingly evaluated in the early-stage startup ecosystem are Rippling and Central. At first glance, both appear modern, automation-centric, and founder-friendly. However, their philosophies, capabilities, operational depth, and long-term scalability diverge dramatically — and those differences become more consequential as teams expand beyond the first handful of employees.
Rippling was designed as a unified workforce platform that connects HR, payroll, IT, and Finance on a single system. Its entire architecture is built around the employee graph, a unified data foundation that ensures every change to employee information cascades seamlessly across tax settings, payroll calculations, benefits eligibility, device provisioning, security policies, app access, and financial workflows. Startups adopt Rippling for its ability to automate everything from onboarding to tax compliance, and they continue to use it long after reaching hundreds or thousands of employees because the platform evolves with them. Rippling is built not just for speed, but for accuracy, reliability, and long-term operational maturity.
Central, by contrast, is a company founded in 2024 with roughly twenty employees that positions itself as an AI-first, Slack-native back-office solution for startups. Its messaging is bold, promising “payroll, compliance, and all the bullshit for startups” and marketing the idea that founders can outsource their back office to a combination of AI agents and human experts. Central claims founders will “spend zero hours on back office,” offers rapid Slack-based onboarding, and markets a simple, single-price model with HR services bundled in. These messages resonate strongly with YC-stage companies whose primary concern is speed and minimal overhead.
However, Central’s promise of radical simplicity obscures a set of structural weaknesses. The platform does not function as a true HRIS and lacks the foundations required to support companies once hiring, benefits configuration, state compliance, multi-state expansion, or more advanced workflows begin. Central operates primarily through Slack threads rather than a unified administrative system. Its “AI” capabilities handle only the simplest tasks, passing anything remotely complex to human operators without providing customers visibility into what is actually happening. Its benefits are not PEO-grade; they are standard ASO market-rate plans rebranded as “free insurance,” leaving founders paying more for less coverage. And because it has no IT, Finance, spend, global payroll, ATS, LMS, or device provisioning capabilities, companies inevitably outgrow Central and must re-implement an entirely new system within months.
YC startups have already begun to churn back to Rippling shortly after adopting Central. Central customers like Stack Auth, Idler, and Calltree AI cite issues with integrations, unreliable support, incomplete compliance execution, and the inability to scale beyond the earliest stages of company building. Central may promise a ten-minute onboarding experience, but founders are often left with weeks of cleanup work as benefits, payroll, tax registrations, and compliance errors begin compounding.
Rippling delivers the same speed Central advertises but with the stability, breadth, transparency, and scalability that early-stage startups inevitably require. While Central offers a quick, AI-themed entry point, Rippling provides the long-term system that companies grow into rather than out of.
Key features
Rippling
Unified workforce platform connecting HR, payroll, IT, and Finance through a single employee graph
Automated state tax registration, compliance workflows, and multi-state support
Native payroll engine with real-time synchronization across HR, benefits, time, and IT
Seamless onboarding and offboarding connected to app provisioning, device management, and cost center configuration
Enterprise-grade benefits administration, with PEO support when companies need aggregated rates
Over 650 integrations across HR, identity, security, accounting, and productivity tools
Advanced reporting engine with pivot tables, formulas, drilldowns, and dynamic dashboards
In-house support with publicly published metrics and sub-minute average response times
Central
Payroll, benefits, compliance filings, business insurance, and HR services bundled into a single Slack-driven system
AI-assisted Slack bot to initiate tasks and answer basic questions, with complex actions routed to human operators
“10-minute onboarding” for payroll setup, designed for founders with no HR experience
One flat $50 PEPM pricing model that includes HR services and Slack-based support
Newly launched accounting and taxes module intended for early-stage back-office workflows
Slack-native experience encouraging founders to manage operations without a traditional admin dashboard
Designed specifically for founders at very small YC-stage companies with under ~10 employees
Summary: Rippling delivers a unified, deeply integrated product suite spanning HR, IT, and Finance, while Central offers a narrow Slack-based experience focused primarily on payroll, benefits, and compliance filings. Rippling provides a scalable platform from day one through enterprise scale, whereas Central functions as a temporary starter tool for companies still in the earliest stages.
We run all our HR on Rippling: payroll, health insurance, benefits, and more. We’ve been able to scale up to this point with no real full-time HR ops person, and for a long time it was only me doing HR/Ops.
Michael Truell
CEO and Founder
I don’t think going from 20 to 100 employees would’ve been possible without a well-integrated tool running so many different things for us. I attribute most of our speed and our ability to scale the team to Rippling.
Puneet Sabharwal
Head of People and Brand at Clay
Pros and cons
Rippling
Pros:
Fully unified architecture connecting HR, IT, payroll, benefits, and Finance
Deep automation across onboarding, workflows, access provisioning, payroll changes, and compliance
Modern, intuitive platform with scalable infrastructure for teams from 2 to 5,000+
Transparent, accurate compliance and robust reporting capabilities
Enterprise-quality health benefits through PEO, offering broad coverage at lower cost
Large integration ecosystem supporting the full SaaS stack
Support model built on in-house specialists with rapid response times
Cons:
With so much depth and flexibility, Rippling can seem complex at first, but the dedicated support team makes it easy to learn quickly
Advanced workflow automations may require support for initial set-up, but they're easy to implement and will save time long-term
Central
Pros:
Simple, flat pricing designed to appeal to founders overwhelmed by back-office responsibilities
Slack-native onboarding that feels fast and conversational, reducing perceived setup friction
AI-assisted workflows that give early-stage users the impression of automation
Founder-led support model, with executives willing to join onboarding calls
Strong early resonance within the YC ecosystem, benefiting from network effects
Cons:
Limited scalability; works for 1–3 employee teams but breaks quickly once headcount, compliance, or multi-state needs emerge
No PEO, meaning higher insurance costs and no access to aggregated rates or enterprise-grade plans
No IT, Finance, spend, device management, or workflow automation tools
“10-minute onboarding” applies only to payroll; compliance, benefits, and tax configuration require weeks of manual correction
AI usage is narrow and risky, with no audit trail, transparency, or policy enforcement system
Absence of a system of record; founders cannot audit activity when everything happens in Slack messages
Higher total cost of ownership when factoring the need for additional HR, IT, and Finance point solutions
Summary: Rippling is the platform startups grow into, offering automation, accuracy, scalability, and full operational coverage. Central is the platform startups quickly grow out of, offering speed at the cost of reliability, transparency, and long-term viability.
As an HR team of one, Rippling helped me manage all of my tasks as we scaled our team from roughly 50 to 400+ employees
Wei Deng
Founder & Co-CEO at Clipboard Health
Pricing
Rippling
Rippling’s pricing is intentionally designed to be transparent, modular, and predictable as companies scale. The platform begins at a low per-employee monthly rate ($8 USD) for its unified core HR system, with additional capabilities such as payroll, benefits administration, time and attendance, device management, app provisioning, corporate cards, bill pay, and other modules available as add-ons. Because Rippling was engineered as a single integrated system rather than a collection of loosely connected tools, the total cost of ownership remains stable even as complexity increases. This unified approach eliminates the hidden expenses that arise when businesses attempt to stitch together separate HR, payroll, compliance, IT, and finance systems.
A major driver of Rippling’s cost efficiency is automation. Many tasks that normally require hours of manual effort, such as registering new states, recalculating benefits deductions, resolving compliance discrepancies, updating access to applications when employees move roles, or syncing payroll data to accounting systems, are handled automatically. This significantly reduces administrative headcount and eliminates the kinds of operational mistakes that can lead to costly fines or rework. Rippling also avoids the expensive professional services fees commonly associated with legacy systems, since customers can configure workflows, permissions, policies, and advanced automations directly inside the platform without needing outside consultants.
Most importantly, Rippling offers a pricing structure suited not only to early-stage companies but to those planning to grow. Startups never need to “rip and replace” their HR system or migrate their data into a new platform as they hire across states, add managers, introduce compliance requirements, or begin scaling organizational complexity. Rippling provides a foundation that remains cost-effective, regardless of team size.
Central
Central takes a different approach to pricing, offering a single flat rate for all customers ($50 PEPM) plus a fixed platform fee. At first glance, this simplicity may appeal to founders who are choosing their first payroll system and want a quick, low-commitment setup. Central markets this pricing model as “founder-friendly,” emphasizing that HR services are bundled into the fee regardless of headcount.
However, this single-price structure conceals deeper challenges. Central’s product is extremely narrow, covering only payroll, benefits, compliance filings, business insurance, and HR services. Because it offers none of the broader HR, IT, or Finance capabilities companies inevitably need, founders must purchase several other point solutions to fill the gaps as soon as they begin hiring or expanding beyond the earliest stages. Tools for time tracking, onboarding, device management, identity access, applicant tracking, learning, performance management, expense controls, and global payroll all fall outside Central’s scope, forcing founders to piece together a patchwork of systems that increases their overall spend and creates inefficiencies.
Central’s benefits offering also introduces long-term cost risk. Because Central is not a PEO, the company cannot provide aggregated rates or enterprise-grade benefits. Instead, Central passes through standard ASO market plans and markets them as “free insurance,” even though the actual cost to founders and employees is significantly higher compared to PEO-grade plans available through Rippling. For companies operating in competitive hiring markets, this can become a major disadvantage as teams grow and demand better coverage.
Central’s pricing model may seem fixed, but the total cost of ownership often balloons as soon as startups begin hiring across multiple states, need HR workflows beyond payroll, or add even modest complexity. Startups that adopt Central frequently discover that the initial promise of low-cost simplicity transforms into higher long-term expenses as additional systems, consultants, integrations, and manual workflows accumulate.
Summary: Rippling delivers predictable, scalable pricing tied to a unified system that automates the majority of HR and payroll operations, dramatically reducing long-term administrative overhead. Central markets a simple, flat pricing model that appears inexpensive at first glance, but its narrow feature set and lack of scalability result in higher total costs as companies begin to grow.
Rippling minimized the hours our teams would spend bogged down in manual, admin work — freeing us to think strategically, our employees to serve clients, and our leaders to grow the business.
Julia Snider
HR Specialist at Curiosity
Automation
Rippling’s automation capabilities stem directly from its unified architecture. Because all HR, payroll, IT, and Finance systems share the same underlying employee graph, Rippling can automate not just individual tasks, but entire multi-step workflows that span multiple business functions. When a new employee joins, for example, Rippling automatically initiates every required action: generating paperwork, issuing offer letters, collecting documents, provisioning devices, assigning applications, enrolling the employee in the correct benefits, setting permissions, registering them for taxes in their work state, configuring their payroll details, and ensuring they are added to the correct cost centers and policy groups. These sequences run instantly and accurately, without the need for manual coordination between separate tools or departments.
This level of automation is possible only because Rippling has built every module — whether HR, payroll, IT, or Finance — on a common data spine that can trigger fully connected workflows. Administrators can create custom automations using Rippling’s Workflow Studio, a visual builder that allows them to design complex flows without writing code. These workflows can be triggered by any event: compensation changes, promotions, department transfers, security policy updates, training requirements, time-off requests, expense submissions, or system integrations. Because all actions occur inside a single platform, Rippling eliminates the manual data reconciliation, cross-tool duplication, and human error that burden growing startups.
Where automation becomes even more impactful is in ongoing operations. As employees change states, take on new responsibilities, or adopt new tools, Rippling updates their tax profiles, payroll rules, access permissions, device policies, and reporting structures automatically. Rippling also monitors compliance continuously and is able to correct issues — or alert administrators to risks — in real time. For high-growth companies, this reduces the administrative workload dramatically and ensures a level of operational precision that manual workflows simply cannot match.
Central
Central’s automation story is built around the idea of an AI-first, Slack-native back-office assistant. While the surface-level narrative is appealing (founders chat with a bot that supposedly handles tasks automatically), the reality is far more constrained. Central does not have a unified platform or a workflow engine. Instead, it relies on a narrow set of Slack-based interactions that pass simple requests to an AI assistant, but any action beyond the most basic triggers a hand-off to a human operator behind the scenes. This means that rather than true automation, Central delivers a concierge-style experience in which founders issue instructions through Slack and humans carry out the work in the background.
Because Central’s product is not built on a unified system, the AI assistant has no reliable or consistent way to modify employee data across connected systems, monitor compliance, or coordinate multi-step workflows. There is no administrative dashboard that founders or operators can use to see system events, and there is no audit trail that explains how compliance filings were handled, how benefits were structured, or what state registrations were completed. Central’s “10-minute onboarding” experience applies only to initial payroll setup and does not reflect the complex work required to maintain ongoing compliance, benefits, and state registrations — work that often gets delayed, misconfigured, or executed manually in Slack without transparency or automation.
Central’s use of Slack as the primary interaction layer presents another limitation: founders cannot build workflows, configure policies, or automate processes across HR, IT, and Finance. The system does not support triggers tied to employee milestones, role changes, or compliance events. It cannot update settings based on location changes or handle multi-state hiring in an automated manner. Once companies begin adding headcount, hiring across states, or introducing internal structure, Central’s lack of true automation becomes a bottleneck. This is why many YC teams report that while Central felt fast at first, they quickly faced weeks of cleanup work to correct issues that were created by inconsistent or incomplete back-end execution.
Summary: Rippling offers true cross-functional automation built on a unified architecture capable of orchestrating multi-step workflows across HR, payroll, IT, and Finance. Central provides a Slack-based experience that mimics automation but relies heavily on humans-in-the-loop, resulting in fragile, opaque processes that do not scale. For startups that expect to grow rapidly, require multi-state coordination, or want accuracy and efficiency across operations, Rippling provides a fundamentally superior automation foundation.
Before Rippling, we were hiring so many people without any onboarding processes in place. Now, I’ve built all of it out using workflows within Rippling, and it’s a much smoother experience for employees.
Cassandra Margolin
Head of People at Jasper
Support and user experience
Rippling
Rippling’s support model is purpose-built for modern, fast-moving companies that cannot afford delays when it comes to payroll, compliance, or onboarding workflows. Support is delivered primarily through live chat, with sub-minute average response times and the ability to escalate into video or screen-sharing sessions instantly when needed.
Rippling’s support specialists are trained across the entire platform, including payroll, benefits, device management, access provisioning, integrations, reporting, workflows, and compliance automation. This allows Rippling to resolve issues holistically rather than routing customers through multiple departments. When a payroll discrepancy stems from a time-tracking configuration or an IT permission error, Rippling specialists can diagnose and resolve the issue without requiring escalations across siloed teams.
Rippling is also unique in the HR industry for its radical transparency around support metrics: the company publicly publishes responsiveness, CSAT scores, and resolution rates so customers always know the level of service they can expect. This transparency reinforces Rippling’s commitment to responsiveness and accountability.
From a user experience perspective, Rippling provides a modern, cohesive interface across all modules. Administrators, managers, and employees navigate a consistent design system whether they are onboarding new hires, approving expenses, adjusting access permissions, or running payroll. Not only does this reduce training time, but it also improves adoption and minimizes friction across teams.
Because Rippling unifies HR, IT, and Finance in one system, employees receive a seamless experience from Day 1. New hires can complete onboarding documents, set up devices, gain access to necessary apps, enroll in benefits, and prepare for payroll — all from a single guided flow. No other platform in this comparison can deliver such an integrated experience.
Central
Central’s support and user experience are defined by its Slack-native model: a design choice that initially feels fast, conversational, and founder-friendly, but reveals major structural limitations as soon as complexity enters the picture. Central positions Slack as not only its support channel but effectively the entire platform. Founders interact with the product through Slack messages sent to an AI assistant, which Central claims handles HR, payroll, benefits, compliance, and back-office tasks on their behalf. While this model seems to reduce friction at the outset, it quickly becomes clear that Slack is not a system of record, nor is it a viable platform for orchestrating or auditing complex administrative processes.
As soon as founders ask the bot to perform anything beyond the simplest tasks, Central’s AI passes the work to human operators sitting behind the scenes. The company markets this as “AI-assisted HR,” but because there is no administrative dashboard, no policy engine, and no centralized record of actions taken, founders cannot see what the bot or its human handlers are actually doing. Decisions such as how compliance filings were handled, how benefits were configured, or how employee data was modified become buried in Slack threads. There is no clear audit trail, no visible state for workflows, and no way to confirm whether a task was completed accurately, incompletely, or in a way that could create long-term risk.
This support model works briefly for teams of one to three founders with extremely simple payroll needs. But as soon as a company begins hiring, introduces benefits complexity, or hires across multiple states, Central’s Slack-based support system begins to strain. The absence of an administrative interface means founders cannot configure workflows, correct mistakes, or review system activity. Every issue must be routed through a Slack conversation that may or may not trigger the correct sequence of actions. Customers describe the experience not as a platform but as a concierge service: fast at the surface, but fragile and opaque beneath it.
Many YC teams have already churned from Central because of issues with support quality and operational transparency. Stack Auth left after two months, citing missing integrations and unresolved issues in Slack. Idler returned to Rippling after realizing that the initial “quick and easy” experience masked weeks of manual work. Calltree AI moved to Rippling PEO before making their first hire, citing Central’s lack of scalability and insufficient support structure for anything beyond the earliest phases of company building. These experiences highlight the core problem: Central’s support model is not designed for companies that plan to grow.
Central’s reliance on Slack also means it has no native processes for onboarding, IT provisioning, multi-system integrations, or finance workflows. The bot can answer simple questions and route tasks, but anything requiring durable configuration, cross-functional workflow logic, or compliance reasoning falls back to humans working behind the scenes. Whether these humans follow consistent procedures is unclear, and because founders do not see the work performed, errors accumulate silently until they surface during payroll runs, benefits events, or tax filings.
Summary: Rippling offers a modern, transparent, deeply capable support experience grounded in unified architecture and specialist expertise. Central offers a Slack concierge model that masks product immaturity but cannot provide the reliability, visibility, or scalability that growing companies require.
Rippling helps me be a strategic partner and translate business objectives into action by giving me access to employee data in a way that can very quickly get insights.
Taylor Baisey
Head of People and Talent at Forterra
Reporting and analytics
Rippling
Rippling’s reporting and analytics capabilities reflect the strength of its unified platform. Because Rippling connects HR, payroll, benefits, time tracking, expenses, device management, app access, and financial data within a single system, administrators can generate reports that draw from every corner of the organization’s operations. The reporting engine is built on Rippling’s centralized employee graph, allowing every field (from tax rates to device serial numbers) to be referenced, combined, filtered, and analyzed without manual exports or spreadsheet stitching.
This unified foundation unlocks a deeply powerful analytics environment. Teams can create reports that tie together payroll outcomes with benefit deductions, state compliance status, and job-classification changes. They can evaluate retention in the context of onboarding workflow completion, assess performance trends alongside time and attendance patterns, and connect access permissions or device compliance with payroll or expense irregularities. Because the data is consistent across modules, Rippling guarantees accuracy and eliminates the common reporting contradictions that plague companies using multiple standalone systems.
Rippling’s reporting engine supports custom calculations, dynamic formulas, multi-level grouping, and the creation of dashboards that visualize trends across departments, cost centers, states, or job roles. Reports can be scheduled, automatically delivered to managers, or embedded into workflows, giving companies continuous insight into workforce operations. This makes reporting not just a tool for administrators, but a strategic asset for leadership teams seeking to understand trends across recruiting, turnover, overtime, benefits usage, compliance gaps, spending patterns, and overall workforce productivity.
Most importantly, Rippling’s reporting model scales effortlessly. Whether a company remains a twenty-person startup or grows into a multi-entity, multi-state organization, every workflow, every integration, and every employee update feeds directly into the same analytics engine. This continuity allows companies to build institutional memory and operational intelligence over time, something impossible when data is fragmented across Slack threads, manual processes, and disconnected point solutions.
Central
Central’s reporting and analytics capabilities are limited because Central does not operate as a true HRIS, lacks a unified system of record, and performs the majority of its work through Slack-based conversations and human-in-the-loop processes. There is no centralized reporting interface, no analytics dashboard, and no consolidated data model that pulls together HR, payroll, benefits, state filings, or workforce activity. Central’s operations occur through a Slack bot that responds to prompts, hands tasks off to human operators, and returns results inside chat messages rather than a structured administrative interface.
This model presents a significant reporting challenge. Because Central does not maintain a cohesive back-end infrastructure that captures workflow events, data changes, approvals, compliance filings, or benefits adjustments in a structured way, the system has no ability to provide meaningful analytics. Founders cannot generate reports that combine payroll outcomes with benefit elections, tax registration statuses, employee classifications, time-off balances, device compliance, or financial outputs. The system does not support formulas, custom calculations, multi-dimensional grouping, audits, or any of the advanced reporting functions required to make informed operational decisions.
Even basic visibility is difficult with Central because Slack threads do not serve as a reliable historical record. Important actions carried out by the AI assistant or the humans behind it are not indexed, timestamped, or easily retrievable. When founders need to understand what changes were made, what filings were submitted, what benefits were configured, or how payroll data connects to compliance activity, there is no central place to find the answer. The absence of a system of record means that operational knowledge exists only in message logs, and even those logs often fail to reflect the full set of actions taken in the background.
As companies begin to scale beyond the earliest stages, this lack of visibility becomes a major liability. Without a clear reporting engine, founders cannot understand their true cost structure, ensure correct state compliance, audit historical activity, reconcile payroll or benefits issues, or monitor the growth and performance of their teams. Central cannot offer integrations that would bridge this gap because the product has no real data spine to integrate with. As a result, companies that try to operate on Central eventually find themselves blind to the information necessary to run a compliant and efficient business.
Summary: Rippling provides a deeply integrated analytics engine that gives startups and scaling companies real-time visibility across HR, payroll, IT, and Finance. Central offers no meaningful reporting capabilities, no system of record, and no ability to generate cross-functional insights, leaving founders without the information they need to manage their workforce confidently or accurately.
What used to take a ton of manual effort now happens seamlessly, giving our new hires, and our teams, a much better experience.
Michelle Colangelo
Director of People at Sibros
Legal coverage and compliance
Rippling
Rippling’s approach to compliance is rooted in its unified architecture. Because every workforce system, including HR, payroll, time tracking, benefits, device and app access, tax registration, and security is connected through a single employee graph, Rippling maintains a real-time and deeply accurate view of every compliance requirement that applies to every employee. This allows the platform to proactively enforce federal, state, and local labor laws, automate state tax registrations, adjust payroll and benefits configurations as employees move across jurisdictions, and maintain precise, auditable records of all compliance-related actions.
From the moment a new employee is hired, Rippling ensures that every required compliance step is completed automatically. Tax withholding and state registration workflows are immediately triggered based on the employee’s exact work location. Policies, mandatory forms, and required documentation are assigned with no manual effort. As employees move or change roles, Rippling updates the legal and regulatory obligations tied to their new status. If a company expands into additional states, Rippling handles the associated tax registration processes automatically and keeps administrators fully informed throughout the process.
What distinguishes Rippling from early-stage providers is not merely that it performs these tasks, but that it does so with complete transparency and traceability. Companies can see precisely when a filing was submitted, what information was used to generate a tax registration, how compliance rules were applied, and what triggered each automated action. It creates a single source of truth that ensures consistency between payroll, HR data, benefits, equipment access, and financial records. This comprehensive compliance infrastructure allows companies to operate confidently across multiple states and jurisdictions without relying on fragile manual processes or ad hoc Slack-based communication.
Rippling further supports compliance by centralizing sensitive actions such as I-9 verification, benefits eligibility checks, COBRA administration, wage and hour rule enforcement, PTO and sick-leave compliance, and device or system-access audits. Because these systems speak to one another natively, Rippling can anticipate risk and correct issues before they become costly. Startups and scaling companies benefit from an infrastructure that eliminates the need for founders or HR teams to memorize compliance requirements or chase down details across disconnected tools.
Central
Central presents itself as an all-in-one compliance solution for founders, promising “zero fines” and “zero work” through an AI-first experience embedded entirely in Slack. While this message resonates with overstretched early-stage founders, the underlying system lacks the architecture and safeguards needed to deliver true, reliable compliance at scale. Central does not operate as a compliance engine. It does not have a unified system of record, nor does it provide structured workflows, automated triggers, or a policy management layer that coordinates actions across HR, payroll, benefits, and tax responsibilities. Instead, compliance work happens through human-in-the-loop interactions behind a Slack interface. This means that critical processes such as setting up state filings, handling SUI rates, preparing compliance documentation, managing benefits eligibility, or executing tax obligations are conducted manually by Central staff, with no transparent audit trail for founders to review.
Central’s “AI assistant” performs only basic tasks; anything even moderately complex is routed to humans behind the scenes. Since founders interact solely through Slack threads, they cannot see the steps taken, the rationale behind decisions, or whether filings were completed accurately. This lack of transparency creates risk because founders do not have access to a standardized log of compliance activity. If an issue emerges like a misfiled form, a benefits misconfiguration, or an employment eligibility oversight, there is no system-level record to investigate what happened or how to fix it.
Central also lacks the infrastructure needed to enforce compliance rules automatically. It does not apply jurisdiction-specific logic for wage laws, paid sick leave, overtime regulations, break requirements, or state and local tax rules. Unlike unified systems that monitor and respond to regulatory conditions at the employee level, Central’s system cannot detect when employees cross state lines, change work locations, or trigger new compliance requirements. These events must be manually surfaced and executed by Central’s internal team, creating both delays and error risk.
As companies expand, this model becomes increasingly fragile. Founders must rely on Slack messages to determine whether filings have been completed correctly. There is no centralized dashboard showing compliance status across employees or states. There is no automated logic updating compliance when employees move or new jurisdictions are added. Central’s concierge-style approach may feel effortless for a one or two-person team, but it lacks the structure and reliability required for companies that plan to hire, expand beyond a single state, or operate in regulated spaces.
Summary: Rippling provides a robust, automated, and transparent compliance infrastructure built directly into its unified workforce platform. Central delivers a Slack-based concierge model with limited visibility, manual operations, and outsourced compliance functions. For startups that value reliability, auditability, and long-term accuracy, Rippling offers a significantly stronger compliance foundation.
We’re going to be in compliance because of Rippling. There’s a lot of ‘I can sleep at night,’ comfort because I rely that much on Rippling and have yet to be let down.
Sarah Cravens
Head of Employee Experience at Aptera
Payroll and benefits management
Rippling
Rippling’s payroll and benefits experience is built for both speed and accuracy, supported by deep integration across HR, IT, Finance, and compliance systems. Because every aspect of employee data from hire date and work location to job classification, device access, pay structure, benefits eligibility, and state tax filings lives within a single platform, Rippling’s payroll engine always runs on complete, synchronized data. This eliminates the reconciliation errors and mismatches that occur when payroll systems rely on external sources or when employee changes are entered manually across multiple tools.
Payroll in Rippling can be run in as little as ninety seconds, with every update flowing in automatically. When an employee moves states, Rippling immediately updates their tax registrations and applies the correct state and local tax rules. When a new hire completes onboarding, their payroll profile is fully configured with no duplicate data entry. When an employee chooses or changes benefit plans, Rippling recalculates deductions and employer contributions in real time. When companies add departments or cost centers, Rippling reflects these changes instantly in payroll reporting, accounting integrations, and compliance settings.
Rippling also provides a complete benefits ecosystem directly connected to payroll. Benefits enrollment, eligibility validation, deduction calculations, COBRA administration, and carrier integrations are all handled natively in the product. Rippling’s licensed benefits teams source high-quality, carrier-verified rates, and for companies wanting enterprise-grade coverage at reduced cost, Rippling PEO delivers aggregated plans that outperform what startups typically receive through ASO-market benefits. Because Rippling ties benefits directly to payroll and HR workflows, companies have a level of accuracy and transparency that siloed systems cannot match.
This integration gives startups and scaling companies confidence that their payroll and benefits systems will remain accurate as headcount grows, as team members relocate, and as benefits become more complex. Companies can also automate payroll approvals, create custom workflows around variable compensation, and sync payroll data directly into accounting platforms with detailed, rule-based general ledger mapping.
Central
Central’s payroll and benefits experience is designed primarily for founders of extremely small teams who want fast onboarding with minimal setup. Central markets a “10-minute onboarding” process and a Slack-driven workflow where founders can ask an AI assistant to run payroll, configure benefits, or handle compliance tasks. While this appears efficient at first, the underlying model introduces significant limitations once companies begin to grow, hire across states, or add real operational complexity.
Central’s payroll system is proprietary to Central, but it is thin, lacks the robustness of a true payroll engine, and is not part of a unified platform that connects HR, IT, and Finance together. Payroll actions occur through Slack messages, and any complexity is handled by Central’s internal team manually. Because there is no consolidated administrative dashboard, payroll processing becomes opaque. Founders cannot see configuration settings, audit logs, calculation logic, or the workflow steps Central took to run payroll correctly. This lack of transparency is manageable for a tiny team, but it becomes a major liability once startups begin scaling beyond a few employees.
Central’s benefits offering is similarly limited. Despite marketing language such as “free insurance,” Central does not provide PEO-grade benefits or aggregated rates. Instead, it passes along standard ASO market-rate health plans, which are significantly more expensive and less comprehensive than the enterprise-caliber plans companies can access through Rippling’s PEO. Internal reports show that Central has presented benefit rates and discount claims that do not align with official carrier documentation, and the team delivering these quotes is not built around licensed brokers or benefits experts. This exposes founders to the risk of mispriced benefits, inaccurate cost projections, and plan configurations that fail to meet employee needs as teams grow.
Because Central does not unify payroll with benefits, any change — such as an enrollment update, dependent change, or deduction adjustment — must be executed manually. This siloed process increases the risk of payroll inaccuracies, incorrect deductions, or benefits misclassification. When founders hire employees in new states, Central’s payroll logic does not automatically adjust to multi-state tax obligations or benefits rules. Instead, the company must manually configure compliance through its Slack-based concierge service, which customers report can lead to weeks of cleanup once errors surface.
Central’s lack of a native payroll engine that integrates with a broader HR infrastructure, combined with incomplete benefits administration and the absence of a system of record, creates a fragile environment where founders are forced to trust unseen manual work. While Central may feel fast on day one, this model breaks under the weight of real-world payroll and benefits needs, particularly for teams planning to hire outside their home state, offer competitive benefits, or grow beyond five to ten employees.
Summary: Rippling provides a deeply integrated payroll and benefits system with automated compliance, accurate deductions, native tax logic, enterprise-grade benefits options, and real-time synchronization across the entire employee lifecycle. Central relies on third-party payroll and siloed benefits systems, offers inconsistent benefits transparency, and provides a fragile experience that breaks down as soon as companies begin hiring beyond the earliest stage.
Payroll is holy. You do not want to mess up the payroll system. We needed a system that could do some of the basic HR stuff, but also payroll. And that's how we ended up with Rippling. The best part is not having to think about it… It just works. And I think this is the key for automation, right? With automation, you just want things to just run, and run right.
Hon Weng Chong
CEO & Founder at Cortical Labs
Breadth of product suite
Rippling
Rippling stands apart in the HR and payroll industry because it is not merely a point solution, nor a Slack bot, nor a concierge service dressed in AI messaging. It is a true workforce platform, one that unifies HR, IT, and Finance under a single system. This breadth is foundational, not decorative. It allows companies to consolidate tools, automate cross-functional workflows, and maintain data consistency from onboarding through offboarding. Rippling’s breadth means that hiring managers, HR teams, finance leaders, and IT administrators can all operate inside the same system without needing to manually synchronize data, reconcile employee records, or coordinate tasks that span multiple teams.
In Rippling, the definition of “HR platform” expands far beyond payroll or benefits administration. The platform includes a fully featured HRIS, onboarding and offboarding engines, time and attendance, global HR data models, performance management, learning management, compensation planning, job architectures, and embedded compliance tracking. Beyond HR, Rippling provides device management for laptops and phones, identity and access management for SaaS apps, credential enforcement, provisioning and deprovisioning workflows, and the ability to manage the full hardware lifecycle for employees. Rippling also includes financial tools such as corporate cards, expense management, bill pay, travel workflows, and automated general ledger synchronization with accounting systems. These capabilities interact with one another seamlessly because they were built on the same underlying data model.
This unified approach gives startups and scaling companies the ability to automate workflows that cross departmental boundaries. When a new hire joins, they receive their offer letter, complete paperwork, get assigned a device, receive access to applications, enroll in benefits, set up payroll, and become active in time tracking, all automatically. When an employee changes departments, Rippling shifts their cost centers, adjusts their permissions, moves them into new policy groups, updates their device profiles, and recalculates payroll and benefits settings. When someone leaves, every system they touch (HR, IT, Finance) updates simultaneously. Rippling gives startups a single platform to run the entire employee lifecycle, eliminating the operational entropy that typically occurs once a company grows past ten employees.
Because Rippling delivers all of this natively, companies never need to re-implement or migrate as they scale. Rippling is the system a startup begins with, but also the system it keeps as it matures into a multi-state, multi-entity, or even global organization.
Central
Central’s product suite is intentionally narrow and heavily optimized for the earliest stage of company building. It offers payroll, benefits, compliance filings, business insurance, and an HR services bundle. More recently, Central launched an accounting and taxes module aimed at giving founders a single place to request basic financial tasks. However, none of these functions are underpinned by a unified platform or system of record. Instead, they are executed through Slack messages and a combination of AI prompts and human operators behind the scenes. The result is not a platform but a concierge service: responsive and founder-friendly at the surface, but lacking the structure, transparency, and scalability required for real operational rigor.
Because Central operates almost entirely through Slack, it does not provide an administrative dashboard, workflow builder, integration ecosystem, or policy management engine. There is no system that ties payroll to benefits, benefits to compliance, compliance to IT access, or IT access to Finance. The absence of a real platform means that nothing is automated across functions, nothing is centrally visible, and processes break as soon as companies add headcount, introduce job structures, move to multi-state hiring, or require integrations with third-party tools. Central does not include time tracking, global workforce support, spend controls, corporate cards, device or app provisioning, recruiting, performance management, learning systems, or financial workflow automation. As a result, founders must supplement Central with multiple point solutions almost immediately.
This narrow breadth forces companies into tool sprawl precisely at the moment they begin scaling, which is the opposite of what founders need. Central’s Slack-based “AI assistant” does not serve as a foundation for long-term automation, nor can it evolve into a platform capable of handling the complexity that accompanies rapid hiring or operational growth. Customers quickly discover that Central is best suited as a temporary back-office assistant for teams with fewer than ten employees. Once a company needs more than payroll, benefits, and ad hoc compliance help, Central’s limitations become evident, and teams must switch to a more complete system. This constant switching not only creates frustration but also introduces compliance, payroll, and data integrity risks that compound as companies grow.
Summary: Rippling provides a full workforce platform that unifies HR, IT, and Finance into a single system capable of handling the needs of startups and enterprises alike. Central provides a lightweight Slack-based service with minimal product breadth, leaving founders to assemble and maintain a patchwork of additional tools as their needs grow. Rippling enables long-term operational scalability; Central is optimized only for the earliest-stage companies and breaks quickly beyond that narrow use case.
If you’re already on Rippling, it doesn’t make sense for you to be on anything else… The most valuable thing in life is time, and you’re going to spend it switching between apps when you don’t need to? You can’t get time back, but you can make yourself more.
Kirin Quackenbush
People Operations Manager at Memorang
Bottom line
Rippling provides a modern, unified workforce platform that is built to support startups from their earliest formation through every stage of growth. Its architecture connects HR, payroll, benefits, device management, app access, expense controls, and financial workflows into a single system that updates in real time. This foundation eliminates the scattered tools, manual work, and operational bottlenecks that typically arise as companies scale. Rippling’s automation ensures that processes that normally consume hours (i.e. state tax registrations, role-based permissions, onboarding sequences, benefits eligibility checks, expense approvals, and device provisioning) are completed automatically and accurately. And because Rippling evolves naturally with a company’s growth, founders never reach a point where they must tear out their HR system and rebuild it around something more sophisticated. Rippling is the rare platform that is simple enough for a two-person startup yet powerful enough for organizations with thousands of employees.
Central, on the other hand, is not a platform. It’s a Slack-based concierge service with limited capabilities masked by an appealing narrative. The company promises “zero work” through an AI assistant, but the underlying execution depends heavily on humans performing tasks manually behind the scenes. Central lacks a system of record, lacks unified workflows, lacks integrations, and lacks the infrastructure to support hiring, compliance, or payroll across multiple states. Its benefits offering is not PEO-grade, despite branding that may imply otherwise, and its lack of HR expertise has resulted in misaligned benefit rates, unclear discount structures, and service models that break as soon as customers introduce real-world complexity.
Founders are drawn to Central for its speed, simplicity, and Slack-native interface. However, real user experiences reveal that this simplicity is superficial. Once companies begin hiring, offering benefits, expanding beyond a single state, or coordinating compliance, Central’s Slack threads and manual processes become fragile, untraceable, and error-prone. Many YC teams that adopt Central during the earliest stages churn within weeks or months, moving to Rippling once they realize that Central cannot scale and creates substantial cleanup work.
Rippling offers the velocity that Central advertises, but with the rigor, transparency, and cohesive infrastructure that real operations demand. It eliminates manual work not through hidden human labor, but through modern system design and deep automation. It provides enterprise-quality benefits, robust compliance coverage, accurate multi-state payroll, and cross-functional workflows, all within a system capable of absorbing new complexity without forcing founders to change tools. Rippling is the system startups grow into. Central is the system that startups quickly grow out of.
For founders who want to avoid back-office chaos, eliminate compliance risk, and build a scalable foundation that can support the business for years to come, Rippling is the clear and unequivocal choice.
I wish I had Rippling when I started in HR. Rippling knows how ops teams work. In addition to the software, Rippling’s reps become extensions of your ops team — they are extra thought partners, people that can help optimize your organization.
Amanda Perry
People and Operations Manager at NuvoLogic Consulting
Book a demo. See it in action.
We received responses from employees saying it was so intuitive. We even had people write on the feed saying it was so much better than [our old HRIS system].
Paige Erickson
Senior Director of HR at Forbes Advisor
FAQs
Does Rippling offer more functionality than Central?
Yes. Rippling offers a full HRIS, payroll engine, benefits system, device and app provisioning, identity management, spend controls, corporate cards, global workforce management, and financial workflows — all on one unified platform. Central offers only payroll, benefits, compliance filings, insurance, and HR services, delivered primarily through Slack threads and manual execution.
Is Central actually using AI to run HR and payroll?
Central’s AI assistant handles only basic tasks. Anything moderately complex is routed to human operators behind the scenes, and founders cannot see the workflows being executed. This creates a lack of transparency and increases the risk of hidden errors.
Which system is better for scaling beyond the earliest stages, Rippling or Central?
Rippling. Central breaks quickly once companies hire across states, introduce benefits complexity, or grow beyond a handful of employees. Rippling supports companies from two employees to thousands without requiring a migration.
Is Rippling or Central better for compliance?
Rippling provides native compliance automation tied to HR, payroll, benefits, and IT. Central relies on manual work performed in Slack with no system of record or automated enforcement of compliance rules.
How do benefits compare between Rippling and Central?
Central passes through standard ASO market rates, which are often more expensive and offer less coverage than PEO-grade plans. Rippling provides licensed benefits support, carrier-verified rates, and access to enterprise-caliber plans through Rippling PEO.
Is Rippling or Central better for startups?
Rippling is the better choice for startups that want a system they can keep as they grow. Central may appear fast at first, but it is not built to handle multi-state compliance, benefits scale, IT or finance workflows, or organizational growth. Startups that begin with Rippling avoid painful migrations later and benefit from a platform that evolves naturally with their business.
Is Rippling easier to set up than Central?
Yes. Rippling offers self-serve US payroll setup in about thirty minutes for YC founders and provides structured onboarding workflows for all other teams. Central’s “10-minute onboarding” applies only to initial payroll and not to benefits, compliance, or hiring complexity.
Does Rippling support global teams?
Yes. Rippling supports global contractors, global payroll, EOR, and multi-country compliance. Central does not offer global capabilities.
Disclaimer
Rippling and its affiliates do not provide tax, accounting, or legal advice. This material has been prepared for informational purposes only, and is not intended to provide or be relied on for tax, accounting, or legal advice. You should consult your own tax, accounting, and legal advisors before engaging in any related activities or transactions.
Hubs
Author
The Rippling Team
Global HR, IT, and Finance know-how directly from the Rippling team.
See Rippling in action
Increase savings, automate busy work, and make better decisions by managing HR, IT, and Finance in one place.















