Auth0 vs. Okta vs. Rippling: Which IAM software is best

When you're evaluating identity and access management platforms, the choice often comes down to what you're actually trying to secure. Are you managing customer logins for a SaaS application? Employee access to internal systems? Or both?

Auth0, Okta, and Rippling each take different approaches to identity management, and understanding these differences matters more than comparing feature lists. I've analyzed all three platforms to help you understand which one aligns with your actual needs rather than which one has the most checkboxes.

This comparison explores how each platform handles authentication and authorization services, identity lifecycle management, security, and overall scalability. By the end, you'll have a clear picture of where each solution excels and where it falls short.

Quick comparison: Auth0 vs. Okta vs. Rippling at a glance

Here's how these three platforms compare across their core capabilities and focus areas:

Methodology: How I reviewed different IAM software

To provide a meaningful comparison of these platforms, I evaluated each one across multiple angles that matter for organizations making identity management decisions:

• Use case alignment: The most important distinction between these platforms is their primary use case. Auth0 focuses on customer identity, Okta on workforce identity, and Rippling on unified HR and IT management. I evaluated how well each platform serves its intended audience and what happens when you try to use it outside that scope.

• Feature depth and implementation: Beyond checking whether features exist, I examined how they're implemented and integrated. A platform might offer MFA, but the quality of that implementation varies significantly between a developer-focused CIAM tool and an enterprise workforce IAM solution.

• Integration architecture: I looked at how each platform connects with other systems. This includes the number of pre-built integrations, the quality of those integrations, and how the platform handles data synchronization and workflow automation.

• Pricing transparency and structure: Understanding the true cost requires looking beyond starting prices. I examined pricing models, what's included at each tier, how costs scale, and what additional fees apply for common use cases.

• Developer and admin experience: I considered both the technical implementation experience for developers and the day-to-day management experience for IT administrators. Some platforms prioritize one over the other.

• Security approach: I evaluated not just security features but the underlying security model. This includes how each platform handles risk assessment, threat detection, and compliance requirements.

• User feedback: I also went through reviews on G2, TrustRadius, and Capterra to see what real users say about reliability, support, and overall experience.

Features comparison: Auth0 vs. Okta vs. Rippling

Each platform approaches IAM from a different angle. These feature sections break down what that means in practice.

Authentication & SSO

Authentication and single sign-on determine how users log in and move securely between apps.

Rippling

Rippling’s SSO software is built into its unified HR and IT platform, meaning authentication happens in a system that already knows each user’s role, department, employment status, and reporting relationships from HR data. This connection between HR and access control ensures login decisions are made in real time, not based on delayed syncs or disconnected data sources.

Through a central dashboard and its built-in password manager, RPass, employees can access every application from one secure place. Access updates automatically as HR data changes, so promotions trigger new permissions and terminations revoke access immediately. Rippling also supports protocols like SAML, OIDC, and LDAP, and integrates with Active Directory for hybrid environments.

Auth0

Auth0’s authentication system is built for developers creating customer-facing applications. It offers Universal Login for branded authentication pages and supports multiple login methods, including social, enterprise, and passwordless options. Through Actions, developers can inject custom code into the authentication flow to run complex logic such as validating users, triggering webhooks, or modifying tokens. 

Okta

Okta provides SSO access to cloud, on-premises, and mobile applications through more than 7,000 pre-built integrations. It connects with existing systems like Active Directory, LDAP, and HR platforms, consolidating identities through its Universal Directory. Security is reinforced by ThreatInsight, which analyzes global login patterns to block suspicious activity, while its lifecycle management feature ensures new hires, role changes, and departures trigger instant access updates across all connected apps.

Our verdict: Rippling stands out for workforce authentication because it ties access directly to HR data, eliminating the sync delays that occur when identity and employee systems are separate. 

Okta excels in large enterprises that need to manage access across thousands of cloud and on-prem apps with existing directory infrastructure. 

Auth0 remains the go-to for developers building customer-facing applications that need deep customization and multi-tenant control. If you’re managing employees, Rippling’s unified model offers the simplest, most reliable workflow. 

Multi-factor authentication

Multi-factor authentication strengthens access control by verifying user identity across multiple signals.

Rippling

Rippling uses HR data to make authentication decisions that reflect real employee context, not just generic risk signals. The system evaluates login attempts based on where someone should be according to their role, department, and work location. If a login occurs from an unexpected place or outside typical working hours, additional verification can be required or the attempt blocked. 

Because Rippling also manages devices alongside identity, MFA policies can factor in device posture, requiring encryption, current OS versions, or enrollment in management before granting access to sensitive systems. Behavioral detection adds another layer, flagging attempts to access applications outside a user’s department or role. This context-aware approach strengthens security while minimizing friction for legitimate users.

Transform your identity management with one platform

See Rippling

Auth0

Auth0 is built for flexibility and developer control, supporting one-time passwords, SMS, email, push notifications through Auth0 Guardian, and WebAuthn for biometric or hardware key authentication. Its adaptive MFA evaluates risk and prompts users only when needed, balancing security with a smooth login experience. 

Okta

Okta’s Adaptive MFA assesses login risk using contextual signals such as device security, network location, user behavior, and IP reputation. The platform supports phishing-resistant authentication through Okta FastPass, which removes passwords entirely by using device-based cryptographic keys. Backed by ThreatInsight, Okta aggregates threat data from its global customer base to automatically block malicious IPs and detect credential-based attacks.

Our verdict: Rippling offers the strongest workforce MFA by tying user authentication to real HR data and employment context. It evaluates where employees should be, what they should access, and how they normally log in, adding a layer of intelligence traditional IAM tools lack. 

Identity lifecycle management

Lifecycle management controls how identities are created, updated, and removed as people join, move, or leave your organization.

Rippling

Rippling’s unified architecture gives it a clear edge in identity lifecycle management. Because HR and IT operate in the same system, access changes happen instantly when employment data updates. When someone is hired, their accounts, devices, and app permissions are automatically provisioned based on role, department, and other attributes, right down to the minute they start.

Role changes update access in real time, and offboarding is immediate, revoking all permissions and locking devices the moment termination is recorded. Complex workflows can span both HR and IT, allowing managers and admins to build approval chains, add conditional logic, and automate multi-step processes that other platforms require separate tools to handle.

Auth0

Auth0 focuses on customer identity rather than employee access. Its management API lets developers programmatically create, update, or remove users, while Auth0 Organizations supports multi-tenant setups where each customer organization can manage its own users. 

Okta

Okta delivers lifecycle management for workforce identity by integrating with HR systems to automate the joiner, mover, and leaver process. When a new hire joins, Okta provisions accounts, assigns groups, and grants application access based on policies tied to role, department, and location. 

Access policies

Access policies define who can access what and when, using logic based on attributes, context, or behavior.

Rippling

Rippling leverages hundreds of employee attributes from the integrated HR system. You can create rules based on department, role, manager, employment type, location, start date, job level, and any custom fields your organization uses. Plus policies are dynamic and update automatically as employee data changes.

Auth0

Auth0's approach to policies is developer-centric. Rather than providing a visual policy editor with pre-defined conditions, the platform gives developers code execution capabilities and expects them to implement whatever logic their application requires.

Okta

Okta's policy engine combines multiple contextual factors including device security, network location, user behavior, IP reputation, and authentication strength. Policies can allow access, deny access, or require additional authentication based on conditions you define. 

Our verdict: Rippling wins for access policies when you need granular control based on employment data that lives natively in the same system. The ability to create policies using HR attributes without synchronization, combined with integrated device management, provides advantages that standalone identity platforms need complex integrations to match.

Automate employee access from hire to retire

See Rippling

Auth0 vs. Okta vs. Rippling: Pricing

Understanding the pricing structure of each platform requires looking beyond starting prices to understand what's included and how costs scale.

Rippling

Rippling uses a modular pricing model based on the products you select and your employee count. Core HR starts at $8 per employee per month, and additional modules like payroll, IT, finance, and identity management are priced separately. This structure lets companies tailor their stack to what they actually need without being locked into bundled plans.

Auth0

Auth0 uses a consumption-based pricing model that charges per monthly active user (MAU), with separate tiers for B2C and B2B use cases. The free tier supports up to 25,000 MAUs with core features, while the Essentials plan costs $35 per month for 500 MAUs ($150 per month for B2B). The Professional plan increases to $240 per month for 1,000 MAUs ($800 for B2B), and larger deployments require custom enterprise pricing. 

Okta

Okta uses a per-user subscription model with annual contracts and a $1,500 minimum. Pricing starts at $6 per user per month for the Starter plan. The Essentials plan is priced at $17 per user per month and provides advanced features. Professional and Enterprise plans require custom pricing. Okta’s model is predictable but requires upfront commitment; smaller teams or companies with fluctuating user numbers may find the minimum spend and contract requirements less flexible. 

Auth0 vs. Okta vs. Rippling: Reviews

Here’s how users scored each platform on top review sites:

G2’s deeper ratings show Rippling outperforming competitors in the usability areas that matter most for everyday workflows:

Okta vs. Auth0 vs. Rippling: Pros and cons

Rippling pros and cons

Pros:

• Unified platform eliminates synchronization between HR and identity systems

• Real-time access changes based on actual employment events

• Granular policies based on hundreds of HR attributes

• Integrated device management alongside identity management

• Built-in password manager (RPass) for all applications

• Automated workflows spanning HR and IT operations

Cons:

• New admins may need time to get comfortable with workflow configuration

• Automation policies often require early fine-tuning

• Fewer pre-built integrations than Okta's

Auth0 pros and cons

Pros:

• Generous free tier with 25,000 monthly active users

• Customization through Actions and Forms

• Flexible multi-tenant architecture for B2B applications

• Native support for OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML, and other modern standards

• Marketplace with hundreds of integrations for third-party services

Cons:

• Not designed for workforce identity management

• Not suitable for employee lifecycle management

• Complex customization requires solid understanding of APIs

• Implementation timelines can be impacted by complexity

Okta pros and cons

Pros:

• Lifecycle management for employee onboarding and offboarding

• Built-in features for regulatory compliance and audit requirements

• Advanced threat detection and adaptive authentication capabilities

• Extensive integration network with 7,000+ pre-built connectors

• ThreatInsight provides global threat intelligence

Cons:

• $1,500 annual minimum commitment

• Challenging setup that requires specialized expertise

• Enterprise pricing with minimum contract requirements

• Some features may need additional professional services support

Why Rippling is the best IAM software compared to Auth0 and Okta

While Auth0 and Okta focus specifically on identity management, Rippling IT takes a different approach by combining HR and core IT tools including identity and access management as well as device management into one integrated platform. Rippling offers the option for inventory management as well. 

Unlike traditional identity providers that handle authentication in isolation, Rippling connects employee data across all business systems to enable comprehensive workforce management.

Key capabilities include:

• Automated employee lifecycle management from onboarding to offboarding with integrated device and software provisioning

• Compliance automation with built-in audit trails and policy enforcement across all employee touchpoints

• Custom workflow automation that connects identity changes to business processes and approvals

• Custom zero-trust protocols leveraging hundreds of user attributes for granular security

• Built-in password management with secure sharing capabilities

• Integration support across LDAP, Active Directory, OIDC, and RADIUS protocols

Rippling's identity and access management software is built on top of a unified employee data platform that includes payroll, benefits, device management, and software provisioning. This integration allows for automated workflows that traditional identity providers cannot achieve when working with disconnected systems.

Auth0 vs. Okta vs. Rippling FAQs