OneLogin vs. Okta vs. Rippling: Which IAM software is best
In this article
When it comes to managing user access and authentication, choosing the right identity and access management (IAM) solution can make or break your security posture. OneLogin, Okta, and Rippling are three leading platforms in this space, but they take different approaches to solving the same core problems.
I've spent time analyzing each platform's capabilities, pricing, and other key features to help you understand which solution best fits your organization's needs. This comparison goes beyond surface-level features to examine how each platform handles the complexities of modern identity management.
Quick comparison: OneLogin vs. Okta vs. Rippling at a glance
Here's how these three IAM platforms stack up across key features and capabilities:
Feature | Rippling IT | OneLogin | Okta |
|---|---|---|---|
Overview | Unified HR and IT platform with native IAM capabilities | Standalone IAM solution focused on authentication security | Enterprise IAM suite with extensive integrations |
Multi-factor authentication (MFA) | Dynamic MFA with behavioral detection | SmartFactor authentication with AI-powered risk scoring | Adaptive MFA with contextual risk evaluation |
Single sign-on (SSO) | SSO with HR-integrated access controls | SSO for cloud and on-prem apps with risk-based policies | SSO with ThreatInsight security intelligence |
Identity lifecycle management (ILM) | Automated provisioning tied to HR system | Automates provisioning based on role and directory attributes | HR-integrated joiner/mover/leaver workflows |
API access management | API access integrated with identity and HR | API authentication and administration | Dedicated API access management product |
Access policies | Dynamic policies based on hundreds of HR attributes | Risk-based policies with access denial options | Contextual policies with geofencing and device trust |
Starting price | $8/user/month (billed annually) | $4/user/month (bundled) | $6/user/month |
Methodology: How I reviewed different IAM software
To ensure this comparison provides actionable insights, I evaluated each platform across several key dimensions that matter most to organizations implementing IAM solutions:
Feature completeness: I examined the core IAM capabilities each platform offers, including SSO, MFA, user provisioning, and access policies. I looked at not just what features exist, but how well they're implemented and integrated with each other.
User experience: I considered both the admin experience (how easy it is to configure and manage) and the end-user experience (how friction-free authentication is for employees).
Architecture and integration: IAM solutions don't exist in isolation. I evaluated how each platform connects with HR systems, directories, and third-party applications. This includes the number of pre-built integrations and the ease of creating custom connections.
Security capabilities: I analyzed the specific security features each platform provides, from adaptive authentication to threat detection. This includes understanding how each platform evaluates risk and responds to potential threats.
Pricing structure: Beyond just listing prices, I examined what's included at each tier and how costs scale as organizations grow. This helps you understand the total cost of ownership.
Features comparison: OneLogin vs. Okta vs. Rippling
Let's dive into how each platform handles the core features that define modern IAM solutions.
Multi-factor authentication (MFA)
Multi-factor authentication is the backbone of IAM security. Here’s how each platform approaches it:
Rippling
Rippling IT management software takes a unique approach to MFA by leveraging its integrated HR data to make smarter authentication decisions. The platform's dynamic MFA goes beyond standard contextual checks to understand who your employees actually are and how they typically behave.
The system uses behavioral detection to identify suspicious login attempts. Because Rippling knows your employee's department, role, and location from HR data, it can flag attempts that don't match normal patterns. For example, if someone tries to log in from a different country than where they work, or attempts to access systems outside their normal hours, Rippling can require additional authentication or block the attempt entirely.
Geographic and time restrictions are built into the system. Rippling understands which travel scenarios are possible and which aren't. An employee can't log in from Los Angeles and Moscow within 12 hours, but they could log in from San Francisco in the morning and New York that evening. This level of intelligence helps prevent account takeovers without creating friction for legitimate users.
OneLogin
OneLogin's MFA approach centers on SmartFactor Authentication, which uses AI to analyze multiple risk factors and adapt authentication requirements accordingly. The system evaluates risk signals (location, device, behavior) to determine when additional verification is needed.
The OneLogin Protect app supports push notifications, one-time passwords (OTPs), and biometric verification options including face and fingerprint authentication. OneLogin also supports third-party authenticators including Google Authenticator, Yubico hardware keys, Duo Security, and RSA SecurID.
Okta
Okta's Adaptive MFA evaluates risk based on contextual factors, including device security posture, network location, user behavior, and IP reputation. The platform supports phishing-resistant authentication through Okta FastPass, FIDO2 WebAuthn authenticators, and smart cards like PIV and CAC.
Okta ThreatInsight adds another layer of security by analyzing login attempts across Okta's entire customer base. This global threat intelligence automatically blocks IP addresses associated with credential stuffing attacks and other malicious activity.
Our verdict: Rippling wins for MFA when you need authentication decisions that understand the full employee context. While OneLogin and Okta both offer strong adaptive authentication, Rippling's integration with HR data allows for more nuanced risk evaluation. The ability to automatically understand employee roles, departments, and locations from the source of truth means fewer false positives and better security decisions.
Single sign-on (SSO)
Single sign-on determines how employees access their apps securely. While all three offer SSO, the depth of integration differs:
Rippling
Rippling's SSO software implementation stands out because it's built on top of a unified HR and IT platform. When employees log in, they're accessing a system that already knows their role, department, manager, location, and employment status. This means access controls can be more granular and dynamic than standalone SSO solutions.
The platform provides one-click access to all applications from a central dashboard. Unlike most portals, Rippling’s includes RPass, a built-in password manager that also supports apps without federated authentication. This allows employees to access every application, whether it uses SAML, OIDC, or simple username and password, from a single place.
Rippling's SSO automatically updates when employee data changes. If someone gets promoted and needs access to new applications, Rippling provisions those accounts automatically based on their new role. When someone leaves, access to all applications is revoked immediately. This tight integration between HR events and access control reduces security gaps.
Rippling turned out to be so much more than SSO — it became our hub for access, MDM, patching, and security. One system, orchestrating all of IT.
Randall Parabicoli
Chief Information Officer at Maui Oil
OneLogin
OneLogin provides SSO for cloud applications, on-premises software, and mobile apps. The platform uses policy-driven password security to enforce requirements like password length, complexity, and restrictions on reuse. Users can also configure session timeout policies and enable password reset self-service.
OneLogin's SSO portal supports 21 languages and automatically matches the language to each user's browser settings. For applications that don't support federation, OneLogin uses password vaulting to enable SSO.
Okta
Okta's SSO solution gives users secure access to cloud, on-premises, and mobile applications with a single set of credentials. The platform includes over 7,000 pre-built integrations in the Okta Integration Network.
It unifies identity management by integrating with Microsoft Active Directory, LDAP, HR systems, and third-party identity providers, helping organizations break down silos and manage all user identities from a control plane.
Our verdict: Rippling wins for SSO when you want authentication tightly coupled with employee lifecycle management. While all three platforms provide solid SSO capabilities, Rippling's native integration with HR data means access is always in sync with employment status.
Identity lifecycle management
Identity lifecycle management covers how users are added, updated, and removed across systems. Here’s how each platform automates those processes:
Rippling
Rippling's ILM is where the platform's unified architecture really shines. Because HR and IT systems share the same database, there's no delay between HR events and access changes. When you hire someone, their accounts are created. When they change roles, access updates automatically. When they leave, everything is revoked instantly.
The platform allows you to build complex workflows that span both HR and IT operations. You can set up approval chains that involve multiple stakeholders, create policies that govern how access is granted based on employee attributes, and automate everything from account provisioning to equipment orders.
The fact that everything is all together and I don’t have to go in and link different systems between HCM and MDM makes it easy. It’s great that Rippling gives us one place to manage users and devices, as well as our onboarding and offboarding processes.
Alex Yonetani
Head of IT at Jasper
OneLogin
OneLogin streamlines user provisioning and deprovisioning with automation based on role, department, location, title, and other attributes. It imports entitlement definitions directly from each application and applies flexible rules to determine the right level of access for every user. With its Universal Connector, OneLogin simplifies integrations through pre-built connectors that make it easy to connect with a wide range of systems.
Okta
Okta’s lifecycle management automates the joiner, mover, and leaver process across your application ecosystem. It integrates with HR systems to trigger provisioning and deprovisioning whenever employee status changes. The platform consolidates users from multiple directories into a single management plane, automatically granting access based on predefined policies.
Our verdict: Rippling delivers the most seamless approach to identity lifecycle management by removing the integration layer between HR and IT. Okta and OneLogin offer strong provisioning features, but both rely on sync mechanisms that can cause delays. With Rippling’s unified architecture, HR changes trigger instant access updates with no middleware, no lag, and no security gaps.
Access policies
Access policies determine user permissions across systems, and each platform manages them differently:
Rippling
Rippling's access policies leverage the platform's rich employee data to create highly specific rules. You can create policies based on hundreds of employee attributes including role, department, location, manager, employment type, start date, and custom fields you define.
The system supports dynamic policies that automatically adjust as employee data changes. For example, you might create a policy that grants access to financial applications only to employees in the Finance department with a job level of Manager or above. As people get promoted or change departments, their access automatically updates.
OneLogin
OneLogin enforces policy-based access control using factors like user attributes, authentication strength, location, and risk score. Its SmartFactor Authentication analyzes user behavior and device data to calculate risk scores, triggering stronger authentication when thresholds are exceeded.
Okta
Okta’s policy engine evaluates contextual factors such as device security, network location, user behavior, IP reputation, and authentication strength to decide whether to allow, deny, or step up access. The platform also checks device posture through integrations with endpoint tools, ensuring only compliant devices can connect.
Our verdict: Rippling offers the most granular control over access policies by using employee attributes directly from its unified platform. Unlike Okta and OneLogin, which rely on synced HR data, Rippling can apply policies instantly based on manager, department, employment status, or custom fields. This native integration gives it an edge in precision and speed.
OneLogin vs. Okta vs. Rippling: Pricing
Understanding the cost structure of each platform is important for budgeting and forecasting as your organization grows.
Rippling
Rippling’s pricing starts at $8 per employee per month (billed annually) for its core workforce platform, which includes HR and basic IT management. The final cost depends on which additional modules you include, but Rippling’s bundled approach often replaces multiple standalone tools at a lower total cost. Organizations that use Rippling for multiple functions often find the combined cost competitive with buying separate point solutions. Contact Rippling's sales team for pricing specific to your needs.
OneLogin
OneLogin’s workforce identity plans start at about $4 per user per month for SSO and MFA, scaling to $10 per user per month for advanced packages (all bundle price) with SmartFactor Authentication and lifecycle management. Add-ons like the Universal Connector or delegated administration are available for larger implementations.
Okta
Okta’s workforce identity cloud starts around $6 per user per month for its starter tier, which includes SSO, MFA, and universal directory. Higher tiers, ranging up to $17 or more per user per month, add features like adaptive MFA, user lifecycle management, and access governance. Okta also offers separate Auth0 pricing for customer identity use cases.
Okta vs. OneLogin vs. Rippling: Reviews
Here's how users rate each platform on major review sites:
Review site | Rippling | Okta | OneLogin |
|---|---|---|---|
G2 | 4.8/5 (10,620+ reviews) | 4.5/5 (1000+ reviews) | 4.4/5 (280+ reviews) |
Capterra | 4.9/5 (4,180+ reviews) | 4.7/5 (900+ reviews) | 4.6/5 (90+ reviews) |
TrustRadius | 8.9/10 (2400+ reviews) | 8.8/10 (550+ reviews) | 9.6/10 (80+ reviews) |
Looking more closely at G2's detailed ratings, Rippling leads across the usability metrics that matter most for day-to-day operations:
Category | Rippling | Okta | OneLogin |
|---|---|---|---|
Ease of setup | 9.3 | 8.9 | 8.5 |
Ease of use | 9.5 | 9.3 | 9.1 |
Ease of admin | 9.0 | 9.0 | 8.6 |
Quality of support | 9.3 | 8.9 | 8.6 |
Meets requirements | 9.5 | 9.3 | 9.1 |
It took all the hands out of it. What used to be a 10–15 person scramble across spreadsheets and apps is now largely automated in Rippling — from account creation to app access — so onboarding actually happens on time without us herding cats.
Josh Baker
Process Improvement Director at Go-Forth
OneLogin vs. Okta vs. Rippling: Pros and cons
To help summarize the key advantages and disadvantages of OneLogin, Okta and Rippling, here's a quick overview of the main pros and cons for each solution:
Rippling pros and cons
Pros
Unified platform eliminates synchronization delays between HR and IT systems
Rich employee data enables more granular access policies than standalone IAM tools
Automated workflows span both HR and IT operations
Built-in password manager (RPass) provides one-click access to all applications
Real-time access changes when employee status updates
Behavioral detection uses actual employee data rather than just login patterns
Device management integrated with identity management
Cons
Setup can be complex when replacing multiple legacy systems, though guided support is available
Access rules and automations often need fine-tuning during initial configuration
Teams new to automation may face a learning curve when building workflows and access policies
OneLogin
Pros
OneLogin Sandbox enables safe testing of new features and configurations
SmartFactor Authentication uses AI to make intelligent risk-based MFA decisions
Strong emphasis on authentication security with features like OneLogin Protect and compromised credential check
Desktop SSO supports device trust for Macs and PCs
Cons
Smaller integration ecosystem, targeted toward mid-market and smaller enterprises compared to Okta's enterprise-scale deployment
Users report intermittent reliability issues during peak usage periods
Limited customization options outside of premium tiers
Okta
Pros
Comprehensive identity and access management feature set including SSO, MFA, provisioning, and access governance
Large integration network and pre-built integrations speed up deployment
Behavioral and contextual risk evaluation for adaptive SSO
Admin access can be delegated granularly based on role
Cons
Primary focus on large-scale enterprises, which may not suit smaller businesses
Complex workflow automation can be challenging for non-technical users to configure
Users note push notification issues in the Okta Verify app, affecting login approvals
Why Rippling is the best IAM software compared to OneLogin and Okta
While OneLogin and Okta are both strong choices, Rippling offers a compelling alternative that is especially well-suited for organizations at any size or stage. Rippling's identity and access management solution is part of a comprehensive workforce platform that unifies HR and IT.
With Rippling, core employee data like role, department, and location is centralized in the HR system and automatically synced to configure app access permissions. This allows you to implement granular, role-based access control and automate onboarding, offboarding, and change workflows.
Rippling's access management capabilities include:
Enterprise-grade SSO with a library of pre-built app integrations
Flexible multi-factor authentication options
Automated user provisioning and deprovisioning
Mobile app management for BYOD security
Adaptive security policies powered by device and browser posture assessment
Centralized visibility to monitor authentication attempts and access privileges
Integration with productivity suites like Google Workspace and Microsoft 365
User behavior analytics to detect and respond to anomalous access patterns
Access reporting that provides detailed visibility into who has access to what resources and when they were accessed
Rippling also provides RPass, its built-in team password manager that provides employees with centralized, secure, one-click access to all their apps directly from the Rippling dashboard. By unifying identity and device management with HR data, Rippling helps improve access security while reducing complexity and manual effort for IT teams.
OneLogin vs. Okta vs. Rippling FAQs
What are the differences between Okta, OneLogin, and Rippling?
The main differences come down to architecture and scope:
- Okta is an IAM suite focused on enterprise deployments with extensive integrations
- OneLogin emphasizes authentication security with AI-powered adaptive MFA
- Rippling unifies IAM with HR in a single platform, eliminating sync delays and enabling richer access policies.
From a feature perspective, all three provide core IAM functions like SSO, MFA, and user provisioning. The implementation differs, with Rippling using HR data as the source of truth, OneLogin focusing on smart authentication, and Okta providing a broad set of identity governance capabilities.
Can OneLogin, Okta, and Rippling integrate with HR and payroll systems?
Yes, all three platforms integrate with HR systems, but in different ways. Okta and OneLogin connect to HR systems like Workday, BambooHR, and others through integrations. These integrations sync employee data to the IAM platform, where it's used to drive provisioning and access decisions.
Rippling is fundamentally different because it doesn't integrate with an HR system but rather includes HR, payroll, and benefits as native modules. Employee data doesn't need to sync because it's already in the same database that powers identity management. This eliminates sync delays and data consistency issues.
Which platform is easier to set up?
Both OneLogin and Okta have a relatively straightforward deployment process for basic SSO and MFA. However, Okta is generally seen as having a higher learning curve for advanced features and workflows. Rippling aims to be easier to adopt by providing an intuitive, unified interface across IAM, HR, and IT workloads.
Which platform is more suitable for small businesses?
Rippling and OneLogin are both well-suited for small businesses, while Okta is primarily focused on enterprise deployments. Rippling works well for small businesses because it combines HR, payroll, benefits, IT, and identity in one platform. Small businesses often need all these functions but don't have the resources to manage multiple systems. Rippling's unified approach makes sense at this scale. The platform scales as you grow, so you won't outgrow it.
How does Rippling compare to OneLogin and Okta?
Compared to standalone access management tools like OneLogin and Okta, Rippling offers a few key advantages:
- Tight integration with HR data to automate access changes based on employment status
- Unified platform connecting identity, devices, apps, and security settings
- Comprehensive workforce management capabilities beyond just IAM
- Combined SSO, EMM, and endpoint security for full device and app control
What are the main Okta and OneLogin alternatives in the market?
There are several Okta and OneLogin competitors which include Rippling, JumpCloud, Ping Identity amongst others. When choosing an alternative, organizations should consider factors like integration capabilities, advanced security features, and specific business requirements.
Disclaimer
Rippling and its affiliates do not provide tax, accounting, or legal advice. This material has been prepared for informational purposes only, and is not intended to provide or be relied on for tax, accounting, or legal advice. You should consult your own tax, accounting, and legal advisors before engaging in any related activities or transactions.
Hubs
Author

Michael Hendricks
Head of IT Content
Michael Hendricks is an award-winning writer and editor with over a decade of experience shaping compelling narratives across newsrooms, non-profits, and digital media organizations. With a background that bridges journalism and strategic communications, he brings a keen editorial eye and a sharp understanding of how to translate complex information into stories that connect. Michael currently leads content for Rippling IT, where he manages editorial strategy and content. Previously, he’s worked with outlets such as CNN and Search Party, where he produced and edited stories ranging from geopolitics and public policy to global markets and the business of sports with nuance and care.
Explore more
See Rippling in action
Increase savings, automate busy work, and make better decisions by managing HR, IT, and Finance in one place.
















![[Blog – Hero Image] Identity management](http://images.ctfassets.net/k0itp0ir7ty4/5Hsu8HkmyPFWqWKMcgpz2z/d9c5dad0dae54b424f8977ee85388ae4/Header_Identity_Management_Software_02.jpg)
